Home / Technologies / Firebase Hosting vs SiteGround
Firebase Hosting vs SiteGround: who uses which
SiteGround is on more sites: 87,048 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 100.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Firebase Hosting | SiteGround |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 425 | 47,252 |
| .org on .org | 29 | 7,026 |
| .uk in the UK | 12 | 5,979 |
| .it in Italy | 1 | 4,426 |
| .au in Australia | 3 | 3,396 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 6 | 1,974 |
| .ca in Canada | 5 | 1,729 |
| .net on .net | 35 | 1,663 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Firebase Hosting or SiteGround?
SiteGround is on more sites: 87,048 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 100.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Firebase Hosting and SiteGround together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Firebase Hosting or SiteGround as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.