Home / Technologies / Firebase Hosting vs Statically
Firebase Hosting vs Statically: who uses which
Statically is on more sites: 2,066 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 2.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Firebase Hosting | Statically |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 425 | 1,186 |
| .id on .id | 3 | 204 |
| .app on .app | 157 | 7 |
| .net on .net | 35 | 75 |
| .org on .org | 29 | 63 |
| .in in India | 5 | 43 |
| .uk in the UK | 12 | 22 |
| .br in Brazil | 4 | 27 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Firebase Hosting or Statically?
Statically is on more sites: 2,066 against 869 for Firebase Hosting, about 2.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Firebase Hosting and Statically together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Firebase Hosting or Statically as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.