Home / Technologies / Firebase vs vanilla-lazyload
Firebase vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 35,510 for Firebase, about 1.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Firebase | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 16,480 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 583 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 1,025 | 986 |
| .net on .net | 895 | 954 |
| .by on .by | 1,408 | 102 |
| .uk in the UK | 403 | 957 |
| .in in India | 948 | 362 |
| .de in Germany | 319 | 885 |
64 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Firebase or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 35,510 for Firebase, about 1.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Firebase and vanilla-lazyload together?
64 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Firebase or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.