Home / Technologies / FitVids.js vs vanilla-lazyload
FitVids.js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
FitVids.js is on more sites: 1,121,745 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 25.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FitVids.js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 479,010 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 89,822 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 61,712 | 986 |
| .fr in France | 42,192 | 740 |
| .it in Italy | 37,748 | 504 |
| .uk in the UK | 36,150 | 957 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 27,517 | 841 |
| .net on .net | 23,540 | 954 |
1,058 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FitVids.js or vanilla-lazyload?
FitVids.js is on more sites: 1,121,745 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 25.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FitVids.js and vanilla-lazyload together?
1,058 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FitVids.js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.