Home / Technologies / FitVids.js vs Webpack
FitVids.js vs Webpack: who uses which
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 1,121,745 for FitVids.js, about 2.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FitVids.js | Webpack |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 479,010 | 1,781,021 |
| .org on .org | 61,712 | 169,050 |
| .de in Germany | 89,822 | 66,965 |
| .uk in the UK | 36,150 | 120,575 |
| .net on .net | 23,540 | 66,266 |
| .fr in France | 42,192 | 37,264 |
| .au in Australia | 21,066 | 52,797 |
| .ca in Canada | 15,656 | 46,584 |
464 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FitVids.js or Webpack?
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 1,121,745 for FitVids.js, about 2.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FitVids.js and Webpack together?
464 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FitVids.js or Webpack as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.