Home / Technologies / flatpickr vs lazysizes
flatpickr vs lazysizes: who uses which
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 193,637 for flatpickr, about 4.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | flatpickr | lazysizes |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 85,204 | 472,701 |
| .de in Germany | 11,399 | 50,865 |
| .jp in Japan | 2,998 | 35,838 |
| .ru on .ru | 2,863 | 34,044 |
| .org on .org | 6,739 | 25,003 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,572 | 22,214 |
| .net on .net | 3,936 | 22,755 |
| .it in Italy | 6,311 | 14,575 |
11,511 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, flatpickr or lazysizes?
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 193,637 for flatpickr, about 4.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use flatpickr and lazysizes together?
11,511 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using flatpickr or lazysizes as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.