Home / Technologies / flatpickr vs jQuery matchHeight
flatpickr vs jQuery matchHeight: who uses which
jQuery matchHeight is on more sites: 254,930 against 193,637 for flatpickr, about 1.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | flatpickr | jQuery matchHeight |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 85,204 | 99,552 |
| .jp in Japan | 2,998 | 20,519 |
| .de in Germany | 11,399 | 11,938 |
| .org on .org | 6,739 | 10,149 |
| .it in Italy | 6,311 | 8,286 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,572 | 7,667 |
| .ru on .ru | 2,863 | 7,867 |
| .net on .net | 3,936 | 6,525 |
2,283 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, flatpickr or jQuery matchHeight?
jQuery matchHeight is on more sites: 254,930 against 193,637 for flatpickr, about 1.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use flatpickr and jQuery matchHeight together?
2,283 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using flatpickr or jQuery matchHeight as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.