Home / Technologies / flatpickr vs Turbolinks
flatpickr vs Turbolinks: who uses which
flatpickr is on more sites: 193,637 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 5.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | flatpickr | Turbolinks |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 85,204 | 16,528 |
| .de in Germany | 11,399 | 816 |
| .org on .org | 6,739 | 2,993 |
| .it in Italy | 6,311 | 160 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,572 | 444 |
| .fr in France | 4,677 | 352 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 4,621 | 215 |
| .net on .net | 3,936 | 757 |
106 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, flatpickr or Turbolinks?
flatpickr is on more sites: 193,637 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 5.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use flatpickr and Turbolinks together?
106 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using flatpickr or Turbolinks as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.