Home / Technologies / flatpickr vs vanilla-lazyload
flatpickr vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
flatpickr is on more sites: 193,637 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 4.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | flatpickr | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 85,204 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 11,399 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 6,739 | 986 |
| .it in Italy | 6,311 | 504 |
| .uk in the UK | 5,572 | 957 |
| .ru on .ru | 2,863 | 3,400 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 4,621 | 841 |
| .fr in France | 4,677 | 740 |
344 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, flatpickr or vanilla-lazyload?
flatpickr is on more sites: 193,637 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 4.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use flatpickr and vanilla-lazyload together?
344 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using flatpickr or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.