Home / Technologies / Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) vs StackAdapt
Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) vs StackAdapt: who uses which
Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) is on more sites: 7,155 against 4,451 for StackAdapt, about 1.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) | StackAdapt |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 3,819 | 2,973 |
| .org on .org | 450 | 499 |
| .ca in Canada | 244 | 230 |
| .au in Australia | 190 | 124 |
| .uk in the UK | 152 | 122 |
| .net on .net | 159 | 74 |
| .edu on .edu | 81 | 64 |
| .pl in Poland | 125 | 1 |
93 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) or StackAdapt?
Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) is on more sites: 7,155 against 4,451 for StackAdapt, about 1.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) and StackAdapt together?
93 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Google Floodlight (Campaign Manager) or StackAdapt as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.