Home / Technologies / Fluent Forms vs LiteSpeed Cache
Fluent Forms vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 123,296 for Fluent Forms, about 4.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Fluent Forms | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 58,206 | 255,304 |
| .uk in the UK | 3,648 | 20,858 |
| .br in Brazil | 2,211 | 21,432 |
| .pl in Poland | 1,939 | 20,679 |
| .org on .org | 4,880 | 16,447 |
| .fr in France | 3,298 | 14,644 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 2,250 | 13,133 |
| .au in Australia | 2,630 | 12,134 |
5,916 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Fluent Forms or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 123,296 for Fluent Forms, about 4.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Fluent Forms and LiteSpeed Cache together?
5,916 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Fluent Forms or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.