Home / Technologies / FullCalendar vs intl-tel-input
FullCalendar vs intl-tel-input: who uses which
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 61,900 for FullCalendar, about 6.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | FullCalendar | intl-tel-input |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 20,094 | 241,271 |
| .org on .org | 6,334 | 14,730 |
| .de in Germany | 2,824 | 14,251 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,773 | 11,279 |
| .in in India | 552 | 11,664 |
| .fr in France | 2,739 | 8,355 |
| .net on .net | 1,562 | 8,615 |
| .au in Australia | 744 | 8,090 |
1,220 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, FullCalendar or intl-tel-input?
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 61,900 for FullCalendar, about 6.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use FullCalendar and intl-tel-input together?
1,220 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using FullCalendar or intl-tel-input as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.