Home / Technologies / fullPage.js vs imagesLoaded
fullPage.js vs imagesLoaded: who uses which
imagesLoaded is on more sites: 2,436,189 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 185.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | fullPage.js | imagesLoaded |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,757 | 1,055,565 |
| .de in Germany | 389 | 157,771 |
| .org on .org | 229 | 108,970 |
| .fr in France | 228 | 78,423 |
| .it in Italy | 210 | 70,303 |
| .uk in the UK | 150 | 60,056 |
| .pl in Poland | 159 | 51,431 |
| .net on .net | 322 | 49,326 |
1,303 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, fullPage.js or imagesLoaded?
imagesLoaded is on more sites: 2,436,189 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 185.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use fullPage.js and imagesLoaded together?
1,303 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using fullPage.js or imagesLoaded as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.