Home / Technologies / fullPage.js vs intl-tel-input
fullPage.js vs intl-tel-input: who uses which
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 32.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | fullPage.js | intl-tel-input |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,757 | 241,271 |
| .org on .org | 229 | 14,730 |
| .de in Germany | 389 | 14,251 |
| .in in India | 41 | 11,664 |
| .uk in the UK | 150 | 11,279 |
| .net on .net | 322 | 8,615 |
| .fr in France | 228 | 8,355 |
| .au in Australia | 99 | 8,090 |
132 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, fullPage.js or intl-tel-input?
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 32.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use fullPage.js and intl-tel-input together?
132 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using fullPage.js or intl-tel-input as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.