Home / Technologies / fullPage.js vs Jarallax
fullPage.js vs Jarallax: who uses which
Jarallax is on more sites: 284,348 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 21.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | fullPage.js | Jarallax |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,757 | 129,749 |
| .de in Germany | 389 | 16,013 |
| .org on .org | 229 | 11,229 |
| .fr in France | 228 | 10,653 |
| .it in Italy | 210 | 8,718 |
| .br in Brazil | 70 | 8,657 |
| .in in India | 41 | 6,251 |
| .uk in the UK | 150 | 6,051 |
196 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, fullPage.js or Jarallax?
Jarallax is on more sites: 284,348 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 21.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use fullPage.js and Jarallax together?
196 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using fullPage.js or Jarallax as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.