Home / Technologies / fullPage.js vs lazysizes
fullPage.js vs lazysizes: who uses which
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 71.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | fullPage.js | lazysizes |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,757 | 472,701 |
| .de in Germany | 389 | 50,865 |
| .jp in Japan | 296 | 35,838 |
| .ru on .ru | 357 | 34,044 |
| .org on .org | 229 | 25,003 |
| .net on .net | 322 | 22,755 |
| .uk in the UK | 150 | 22,214 |
| .br in Brazil | 70 | 17,054 |
418 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, fullPage.js or lazysizes?
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 71.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use fullPage.js and lazysizes together?
418 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using fullPage.js or lazysizes as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.