Home / Technologies / fullPage.js vs jQuery matchHeight
fullPage.js vs jQuery matchHeight: who uses which
jQuery matchHeight is on more sites: 254,930 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 19.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | fullPage.js | jQuery matchHeight |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,757 | 99,552 |
| .jp in Japan | 296 | 20,519 |
| .de in Germany | 389 | 11,938 |
| .org on .org | 229 | 10,149 |
| .it in Italy | 210 | 8,286 |
| .ru on .ru | 357 | 7,867 |
| .uk in the UK | 150 | 7,667 |
| .pl in Poland | 159 | 7,595 |
518 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, fullPage.js or jQuery matchHeight?
jQuery matchHeight is on more sites: 254,930 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 19.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use fullPage.js and jQuery matchHeight together?
518 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using fullPage.js or jQuery matchHeight as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.