Home / Technologies / fullPage.js vs PixiJS
fullPage.js vs PixiJS: who uses which
fullPage.js is on more sites: 13,127 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 3.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | fullPage.js | PixiJS |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,757 | 1,736 |
| .kr in South Korea | 827 | 12 |
| .de in Germany | 389 | 175 |
| .cn on .cn | 476 | 48 |
| .net on .net | 322 | 107 |
| .ru on .ru | 357 | 48 |
| .jp in Japan | 296 | 98 |
| .it in Italy | 210 | 147 |
15 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, fullPage.js or PixiJS?
fullPage.js is on more sites: 13,127 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 3.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use fullPage.js and PixiJS together?
15 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using fullPage.js or PixiJS as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.