Home / Technologies / fullPage.js vs Three.js
fullPage.js vs Three.js: who uses which
Three.js is on more sites: 25,096 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 1.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | fullPage.js | Three.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,757 | 11,782 |
| .de in Germany | 389 | 1,393 |
| .kr in South Korea | 827 | 139 |
| .org on .org | 229 | 677 |
| .jp in Japan | 296 | 577 |
| .net on .net | 322 | 550 |
| .cn on .cn | 476 | 389 |
| .ru on .ru | 357 | 483 |
61 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, fullPage.js or Three.js?
Three.js is on more sites: 25,096 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 1.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use fullPage.js and Three.js together?
61 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using fullPage.js or Three.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.