Home / Technologies / fullPage.js vs Turbolinks
fullPage.js vs Turbolinks: who uses which
Turbolinks is on more sites: 32,637 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 2.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | fullPage.js | Turbolinks |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,757 | 16,528 |
| .org on .org | 229 | 2,993 |
| .de in Germany | 389 | 816 |
| .ru on .ru | 357 | 740 |
| .net on .net | 322 | 757 |
| .jp in Japan | 296 | 622 |
| .kr in South Korea | 827 | 21 |
| .io on .io | 45 | 604 |
2 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, fullPage.js or Turbolinks?
Turbolinks is on more sites: 32,637 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 2.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use fullPage.js and Turbolinks together?
2 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using fullPage.js or Turbolinks as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.