Home / Technologies / fullPage.js vs web-vitals
fullPage.js vs web-vitals: who uses which
web-vitals is on more sites: 25,534 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 1.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | fullPage.js | web-vitals |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,757 | 6,745 |
| .br in Brazil | 70 | 7,224 |
| .ar in Argentina | 14 | 6,933 |
| .de in Germany | 389 | 593 |
| .kr in South Korea | 827 | 10 |
| .me on .me | 20 | 571 |
| .net on .net | 322 | 177 |
| .cn on .cn | 476 | 9 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, fullPage.js or web-vitals?
web-vitals is on more sites: 25,534 against 13,127 for fullPage.js, about 1.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use fullPage.js and web-vitals together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using fullPage.js or web-vitals as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.