Home / Technologies / GeneratePress vs LiteSpeed Cache
GeneratePress vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 238,551 for GeneratePress, about 2.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | GeneratePress | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 104,280 | 255,304 |
| .org on .org | 11,390 | 16,447 |
| .uk in the UK | 6,631 | 20,858 |
| .de in Germany | 18,664 | 8,650 |
| .pl in Poland | 3,383 | 20,679 |
| .br in Brazil | 1,947 | 21,432 |
| .fr in France | 8,410 | 14,644 |
| .net on .net | 6,724 | 12,770 |
17,705 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, GeneratePress or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 238,551 for GeneratePress, about 2.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use GeneratePress and LiteSpeed Cache together?
17,705 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using GeneratePress or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.