Home / Technologies / GeneratePress vs WP Fastest Cache
GeneratePress vs WP Fastest Cache: who uses which
WP Fastest Cache is on more sites: 299,890 against 238,551 for GeneratePress, about 1.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | GeneratePress | WP Fastest Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 104,280 | 103,916 |
| .de in Germany | 18,664 | 39,619 |
| .fr in France | 8,410 | 13,724 |
| .org on .org | 11,390 | 8,230 |
| .it in Italy | 4,902 | 9,399 |
| .uk in the UK | 6,631 | 6,855 |
| .net on .net | 6,724 | 6,735 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 5,019 | 6,568 |
5,782 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, GeneratePress or WP Fastest Cache?
WP Fastest Cache is on more sites: 299,890 against 238,551 for GeneratePress, about 1.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use GeneratePress and WP Fastest Cache together?
5,782 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using GeneratePress or WP Fastest Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.