Home / Technologies / Ghost vs WP Fastest Cache
Ghost vs WP Fastest Cache: who uses which
WP Fastest Cache is on more sites: 299,890 against 33,212 for Ghost, about 9.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Ghost | WP Fastest Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 15,914 | 103,916 |
| .de in Germany | 834 | 39,619 |
| .fr in France | 391 | 13,724 |
| .org on .org | 1,654 | 8,230 |
| .it in Italy | 152 | 9,399 |
| .net on .net | 2,219 | 6,735 |
| .ru on .ru | 185 | 7,771 |
| .pl in Poland | 321 | 7,433 |
7 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Ghost or WP Fastest Cache?
WP Fastest Cache is on more sites: 299,890 against 33,212 for Ghost, about 9.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Ghost and WP Fastest Cache together?
7 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Ghost or WP Fastest Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.