Home / Technologies / giscus vs Threads Embed
giscus vs Threads Embed: who uses which
giscus is on more sites: 876 against 27 for Threads Embed, about 32.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | giscus | Threads Embed |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 257 | 14 |
| .io on .io | 122 | 0 |
| .org on .org | 70 | 2 |
| .cn on .cn | 48 | 0 |
| .top on .top | 42 | 0 |
| .dev on .dev | 36 | 0 |
| .xyz on .xyz | 24 | 0 |
| .me on .me | 23 | 0 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, giscus or Threads Embed?
giscus is on more sites: 876 against 27 for Threads Embed, about 32.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use giscus and Threads Embed together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using giscus or Threads Embed as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.