Home / Technologies / GitBook vs LiteSpeed Cache
GitBook vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 22,405 for GitBook, about 24.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | GitBook | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 5,174 | 255,304 |
| .br in Brazil | 133 | 21,432 |
| .uk in the UK | 50 | 20,858 |
| .pl in Poland | 14 | 20,679 |
| .org on .org | 820 | 16,447 |
| .fr in France | 108 | 14,644 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 24 | 13,133 |
| .net on .net | 386 | 12,770 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, GitBook or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 22,405 for GitBook, about 24.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use GitBook and LiteSpeed Cache together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using GitBook or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.