Home / Technologies / GLightbox vs vanilla-lazyload
GLightbox vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
GLightbox is on more sites: 89,218 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 2.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | GLightbox | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 34,560 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 8,343 | 885 |
| .ru on .ru | 2,326 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 3,563 | 986 |
| .net on .net | 3,182 | 954 |
| .uk in the UK | 2,122 | 957 |
| .fr in France | 2,193 | 740 |
| .pl in Poland | 2,216 | 456 |
134 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, GLightbox or vanilla-lazyload?
GLightbox is on more sites: 89,218 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 2.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use GLightbox and vanilla-lazyload together?
134 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using GLightbox or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.