Home / Technologies / Google Programmable Search vs RichRelevance
Google Programmable Search vs RichRelevance: who uses which
Google Programmable Search is on more sites: 47,910 against 53 for RichRelevance, about 904.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Google Programmable Search | RichRelevance |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 15,808 | 9 |
| .jp in Japan | 5,696 | 1 |
| .org on .org | 3,627 | 0 |
| .edu on .edu | 2,836 | 0 |
| .net on .net | 1,960 | 0 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,482 | 2 |
| .ru on .ru | 1,133 | 0 |
| .tw on .tw | 1,039 | 0 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Google Programmable Search or RichRelevance?
Google Programmable Search is on more sites: 47,910 against 53 for RichRelevance, about 904.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Google Programmable Search and RichRelevance together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Google Programmable Search or RichRelevance as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.