Home / Technologies / Google Sites vs LiteSpeed Cache
Google Sites vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 149,525 for Google Sites, about 3.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Google Sites | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 70,643 | 255,304 |
| .org on .org | 21,916 | 16,447 |
| .uk in the UK | 4,730 | 20,858 |
| .br in Brazil | 1,932 | 21,432 |
| .pl in Poland | 807 | 20,679 |
| .net on .net | 4,814 | 12,770 |
| .fr in France | 2,880 | 14,644 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 1,394 | 13,133 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Google Sites or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 149,525 for Google Sites, about 3.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Google Sites and LiteSpeed Cache together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Google Sites or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.