Home / Technologies / Google Translate Widget vs Intro.js
Google Translate Widget vs Intro.js: who uses which
Google Translate Widget is on more sites: 439,392 against 3,450 for Intro.js, about 127.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Google Translate Widget | Intro.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 188,271 | 1,350 |
| .de in Germany | 36,163 | 66 |
| .org on .org | 30,511 | 484 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,810 | 62 |
| .jp in Japan | 17,149 | 19 |
| .ua on .ua | 11,836 | 6 |
| .net on .net | 11,661 | 69 |
| .in in India | 10,577 | 51 |
47 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Google Translate Widget or Intro.js?
Google Translate Widget is on more sites: 439,392 against 3,450 for Intro.js, about 127.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Google Translate Widget and Intro.js together?
47 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Google Translate Widget or Intro.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.