Home / Technologies / Gravity Forms vs LiteSpeed Cache
Gravity Forms vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 299,738 for Gravity Forms, about 1.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Gravity Forms | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 169,311 | 255,304 |
| .org on .org | 21,997 | 16,447 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,387 | 20,858 |
| .au in Australia | 17,731 | 12,134 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 14,933 | 13,133 |
| .br in Brazil | 675 | 21,432 |
| .pl in Poland | 320 | 20,679 |
| .fr in France | 5,394 | 14,644 |
9,684 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Gravity Forms or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 299,738 for Gravity Forms, about 1.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Gravity Forms and LiteSpeed Cache together?
9,684 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Gravity Forms or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.