Home / Technologies / GSAP vs vanilla-lazyload
GSAP vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
GSAP is on more sites: 568,189 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 12.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | GSAP | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 259,460 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 28,022 | 885 |
| .it in Italy | 17,583 | 504 |
| .org on .org | 16,578 | 986 |
| .fr in France | 15,018 | 740 |
| .uk in the UK | 13,552 | 957 |
| .jp in Japan | 13,711 | 212 |
| .ru on .ru | 8,210 | 3,400 |
1,662 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, GSAP or vanilla-lazyload?
GSAP is on more sites: 568,189 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 12.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use GSAP and vanilla-lazyload together?
1,662 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using GSAP or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.