Home / Technologies / Hammer.js vs vanilla-lazyload
Hammer.js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Hammer.js is on more sites: 152,873 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 3.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Hammer.js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .ru on .ru | 63,252 | 3,400 |
| .com on .com | 32,126 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 5,346 | 885 |
| .xn--p1ai on .xn--p1ai | 4,939 | 239 |
| .org on .org | 2,620 | 986 |
| .fr in France | 1,927 | 740 |
| .it in Italy | 1,904 | 504 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,389 | 957 |
73 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Hammer.js or vanilla-lazyload?
Hammer.js is on more sites: 152,873 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 3.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Hammer.js and vanilla-lazyload together?
73 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Hammer.js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.