Home / Technologies / highlight.js vs vanilla-lazyload
highlight.js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 44,557 for highlight.js, about 1.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | highlight.js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 18,516 | 20,712 |
| .net on .net | 5,451 | 954 |
| .ru on .ru | 2,177 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 1,827 | 986 |
| .de in Germany | 1,437 | 885 |
| .io on .io | 1,884 | 113 |
| .fr in France | 750 | 740 |
| .uk in the UK | 359 | 957 |
175 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, highlight.js or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 44,557 for highlight.js, about 1.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use highlight.js and vanilla-lazyload together?
175 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using highlight.js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.