Home / Technologies / hoverIntent vs vanilla-lazyload
hoverIntent vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
hoverIntent is on more sites: 892,329 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 19.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | hoverIntent | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 371,708 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 49,791 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 40,207 | 986 |
| .it in Italy | 29,079 | 504 |
| .uk in the UK | 26,579 | 957 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 21,986 | 841 |
| .net on .net | 21,433 | 954 |
| .fr in France | 21,420 | 740 |
5,689 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, hoverIntent or vanilla-lazyload?
hoverIntent is on more sites: 892,329 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 19.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use hoverIntent and vanilla-lazyload together?
5,689 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using hoverIntent or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.