Home / Technologies / HubSpot CMS vs LiteSpeed Cache
HubSpot CMS vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 67,413 for HubSpot CMS, about 8.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | HubSpot CMS | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 42,471 | 255,304 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,640 | 20,858 |
| .br in Brazil | 625 | 21,432 |
| .pl in Poland | 124 | 20,679 |
| .org on .org | 2,842 | 16,447 |
| .fr in France | 590 | 14,644 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 800 | 13,133 |
| .net on .net | 987 | 12,770 |
10 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, HubSpot CMS or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 67,413 for HubSpot CMS, about 8.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use HubSpot CMS and LiteSpeed Cache together?
10 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using HubSpot CMS or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.