Home / Technologies / Hugo vs SiteGround Optimizer
Hugo vs SiteGround Optimizer: who uses which
SiteGround Optimizer is on more sites: 86,129 against 41,087 for Hugo, about 2.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Hugo | SiteGround Optimizer |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 14,888 | 46,793 |
| .org on .org | 3,322 | 6,939 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,028 | 5,919 |
| .it in Italy | 281 | 4,379 |
| .net on .net | 2,195 | 1,635 |
| .au in Australia | 168 | 3,377 |
| .de in Germany | 2,214 | 1,235 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 464 | 1,955 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Hugo or SiteGround Optimizer?
SiteGround Optimizer is on more sites: 86,129 against 41,087 for Hugo, about 2.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Hugo and SiteGround Optimizer together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Hugo or SiteGround Optimizer as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.