Home / Technologies / HurryTimer vs Intro.js
HurryTimer vs Intro.js: who uses which
HurryTimer is on more sites: 8,423 against 3,450 for Intro.js, about 2.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | HurryTimer | Intro.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 3,858 | 1,350 |
| .org on .org | 496 | 484 |
| .pl in Poland | 491 | 25 |
| .de in Germany | 407 | 66 |
| .fr in France | 194 | 56 |
| .it in Italy | 191 | 38 |
| .uk in the UK | 164 | 62 |
| .net on .net | 155 | 69 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, HurryTimer or Intro.js?
HurryTimer is on more sites: 8,423 against 3,450 for Intro.js, about 2.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use HurryTimer and Intro.js together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using HurryTimer or Intro.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.