Home / Technologies / ImageKit vs Microsoft Ajax CDN
ImageKit vs Microsoft Ajax CDN: who uses which
Microsoft Ajax CDN is on more sites: 43,745 against 20,547 for ImageKit, about 2.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | ImageKit | Microsoft Ajax CDN |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 11,398 | 20,069 |
| .org on .org | 1,111 | 3,845 |
| .uk in the UK | 531 | 3,387 |
| .net on .net | 954 | 1,187 |
| .fr in France | 305 | 786 |
| .dk in Denmark | 21 | 1,011 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 227 | 765 |
| .au in Australia | 223 | 734 |
4 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, ImageKit or Microsoft Ajax CDN?
Microsoft Ajax CDN is on more sites: 43,745 against 20,547 for ImageKit, about 2.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use ImageKit and Microsoft Ajax CDN together?
4 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using ImageKit or Microsoft Ajax CDN as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.