Home / Technologies / imagesLoaded vs Lozad.js
imagesLoaded vs Lozad.js: who uses which
imagesLoaded is on more sites: 2,436,189 against 55,703 for Lozad.js, about 43.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | imagesLoaded | Lozad.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,055,565 | 31,864 |
| .de in Germany | 157,771 | 648 |
| .org on .org | 108,970 | 1,044 |
| .fr in France | 78,423 | 211 |
| .it in Italy | 70,303 | 329 |
| .uk in the UK | 60,056 | 692 |
| .pl in Poland | 51,431 | 459 |
| .net on .net | 49,326 | 2,174 |
4,005 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, imagesLoaded or Lozad.js?
imagesLoaded is on more sites: 2,436,189 against 55,703 for Lozad.js, about 43.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use imagesLoaded and Lozad.js together?
4,005 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using imagesLoaded or Lozad.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.