Home / Technologies / Inertia.js vs PixiJS
Inertia.js vs PixiJS: who uses which
Inertia.js is on more sites: 30,091 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 8.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Inertia.js | PixiJS |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 16,272 | 1,736 |
| .uk in the UK | 2,965 | 51 |
| .org on .org | 690 | 71 |
| .net on .net | 625 | 107 |
| .de in Germany | 493 | 175 |
| .app on .app | 634 | 16 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 393 | 46 |
| .br in Brazil | 390 | 12 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Inertia.js or PixiJS?
Inertia.js is on more sites: 30,091 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 8.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Inertia.js and PixiJS together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Inertia.js or PixiJS as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.