Home / Technologies / Inertia.js vs Turbolinks
Inertia.js vs Turbolinks: who uses which
Turbolinks is on more sites: 32,637 against 30,091 for Inertia.js, about 1.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Inertia.js | Turbolinks |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 16,272 | 16,528 |
| .org on .org | 690 | 2,993 |
| .uk in the UK | 2,965 | 444 |
| .net on .net | 625 | 757 |
| .de in Germany | 493 | 816 |
| .ru on .ru | 351 | 740 |
| .br in Brazil | 390 | 528 |
| .io on .io | 288 | 604 |
1 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Inertia.js or Turbolinks?
Turbolinks is on more sites: 32,637 against 30,091 for Inertia.js, about 1.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Inertia.js and Turbolinks together?
1 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Inertia.js or Turbolinks as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.