Home / Technologies / Inputmask vs jQuery Easing
Inputmask vs jQuery Easing: who uses which
jQuery Easing is on more sites: 1,149,070 against 146,034 for Inputmask, about 7.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Inputmask | jQuery Easing |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 43,290 | 453,070 |
| .ru on .ru | 45,061 | 46,734 |
| .de in Germany | 3,622 | 70,161 |
| .jp in Japan | 102 | 52,613 |
| .org on .org | 4,306 | 45,589 |
| .it in Italy | 1,594 | 42,702 |
| .fr in France | 2,186 | 29,761 |
| .net on .net | 1,921 | 26,541 |
24,624 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Inputmask or jQuery Easing?
jQuery Easing is on more sites: 1,149,070 against 146,034 for Inputmask, about 7.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Inputmask and jQuery Easing together?
24,624 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Inputmask or jQuery Easing as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.