Home / Technologies / Inputmask vs jQuery Migrate
Inputmask vs jQuery Migrate: who uses which
jQuery Migrate is on more sites: 10,479,781 against 146,034 for Inputmask, about 71.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Inputmask | jQuery Migrate |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 43,290 | 4,393,843 |
| .de in Germany | 3,622 | 758,077 |
| .org on .org | 4,306 | 464,402 |
| .fr in France | 2,186 | 315,453 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,784 | 291,468 |
| .it in Italy | 1,594 | 287,185 |
| .net on .net | 1,921 | 243,800 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 1,081 | 243,459 |
63,256 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Inputmask or jQuery Migrate?
jQuery Migrate is on more sites: 10,479,781 against 146,034 for Inputmask, about 71.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Inputmask and jQuery Migrate together?
63,256 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Inputmask or jQuery Migrate as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.