Home / Technologies / Inputmask vs particles.js
Inputmask vs particles.js: who uses which
Inputmask is on more sites: 146,034 against 74,453 for particles.js, about 2.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Inputmask | particles.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 43,290 | 33,280 |
| .ru on .ru | 45,061 | 1,651 |
| .de in Germany | 3,622 | 3,460 |
| .org on .org | 4,306 | 2,745 |
| .br in Brazil | 3,931 | 1,746 |
| .fr in France | 2,186 | 1,894 |
| .net on .net | 1,921 | 1,556 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,784 | 1,605 |
790 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Inputmask or particles.js?
Inputmask is on more sites: 146,034 against 74,453 for particles.js, about 2.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Inputmask and particles.js together?
790 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Inputmask or particles.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.