Home / Technologies / Inputmask vs PixiJS
Inputmask vs PixiJS: who uses which
Inputmask is on more sites: 146,034 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 40.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Inputmask | PixiJS |
|---|---|---|
| .ru on .ru | 45,061 | 48 |
| .com on .com | 43,290 | 1,736 |
| .org on .org | 4,306 | 71 |
| .br in Brazil | 3,931 | 12 |
| .de in Germany | 3,622 | 175 |
| .xn--p1ai on .xn--p1ai | 2,872 | 2 |
| .ua on .ua | 2,595 | 6 |
| .fr in France | 2,186 | 73 |
11 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Inputmask or PixiJS?
Inputmask is on more sites: 146,034 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 40.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Inputmask and PixiJS together?
11 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Inputmask or PixiJS as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.