Home / Technologies / Inputmask vs Three.js
Inputmask vs Three.js: who uses which
Inputmask is on more sites: 146,034 against 25,096 for Three.js, about 5.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Inputmask | Three.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 43,290 | 11,782 |
| .ru on .ru | 45,061 | 483 |
| .de in Germany | 3,622 | 1,393 |
| .org on .org | 4,306 | 677 |
| .br in Brazil | 3,931 | 188 |
| .xn--p1ai on .xn--p1ai | 2,872 | 27 |
| .fr in France | 2,186 | 490 |
| .ua on .ua | 2,595 | 49 |
86 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Inputmask or Three.js?
Inputmask is on more sites: 146,034 against 25,096 for Three.js, about 5.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Inputmask and Three.js together?
86 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Join the waitlist to download every site using Inputmask or Three.js as a spreadsheet and hear when new ones appear.