Home / Technologies / Inputmask vs Underscore.js
Inputmask vs Underscore.js: who uses which
Underscore.js is on more sites: 1,226,291 against 146,034 for Inputmask, about 8.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Inputmask | Underscore.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 43,290 | 529,209 |
| .de in Germany | 3,622 | 73,489 |
| .ru on .ru | 45,061 | 19,026 |
| .org on .org | 4,306 | 55,195 |
| .fr in France | 2,186 | 36,310 |
| .it in Italy | 1,594 | 35,400 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,784 | 34,026 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 1,081 | 25,391 |
23,561 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Inputmask or Underscore.js?
Underscore.js is on more sites: 1,226,291 against 146,034 for Inputmask, about 8.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Inputmask and Underscore.js together?
23,561 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Join the waitlist to download every site using Inputmask or Underscore.js as a spreadsheet and hear when new ones appear.