Home / Technologies / Inputmask vs vanilla-lazyload
Inputmask vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Inputmask is on more sites: 146,034 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 3.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Inputmask | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 43,290 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 45,061 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 4,306 | 986 |
| .de in Germany | 3,622 | 885 |
| .br in Brazil | 3,931 | 303 |
| .xn--p1ai on .xn--p1ai | 2,872 | 239 |
| .fr in France | 2,186 | 740 |
| .net on .net | 1,921 | 954 |
417 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Inputmask or vanilla-lazyload?
Inputmask is on more sites: 146,034 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 3.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Inputmask and vanilla-lazyload together?
417 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Inputmask or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.