Home / Technologies / Inputmask vs Webpack
Inputmask vs Webpack: who uses which
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 146,034 for Inputmask, about 18.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Inputmask | Webpack |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 43,290 | 1,781,021 |
| .org on .org | 4,306 | 169,050 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,784 | 120,575 |
| .de in Germany | 3,622 | 66,965 |
| .net on .net | 1,921 | 66,266 |
| .au in Australia | 1,577 | 52,797 |
| .ca in Canada | 1,508 | 46,584 |
| .ru on .ru | 45,061 | 1,216 |
124 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Inputmask or Webpack?
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 146,034 for Inputmask, about 18.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Inputmask and Webpack together?
124 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Inputmask or Webpack as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.